Session Forty-Nine: GM Commentary

The thing with Zelcor’s riding dogs wasn’t planned at all; the dogs kept dying, as could easily be predicted, and Zelcor’s player started telling me how the various animal sellers were getting mad him for losing so many dogs. At this point Zelcor probably doesn’t even need a riding dog, but he keeps buying (and losing) them because we find it hilarious.

The other point to be made about the riding dog situation is that it illustrates the benefits of a long-running campaign that isn’t super lethal. PCs can reasonably expect to have long adventuring careers, and because of that have time to develop various quirks and character traits that greatly enrich the game. Not every character develops like this, of course, but if you as GM are killing off characters left and right you’re removing the opportunity for anyone to do so.

Posted in GM Commentary

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This website uses trademarks and/or copyrights owned by Paizo Inc., which are used under Paizo's Community Use Policy. We are expressly prohibited from charging you to use or access this content. This website is not published, endorsed, or specifically approved by Paizo Inc. For more information about Paizo's Community Use Policy, please visit For more information about Paizo Inc. and Paizo products, please visit
%d bloggers like this: