Session Forty-Six: GM Commentary

In the olden days, I would have dragged out this journey for several sessions. There would have been numerous random encounters along the way, maybe a mini-adventure in Turtleback Ferry, and probably some final bit of nastiness before the party reached their destination. It was part of the early mindset in D&D that the party had to ‘earn’ their gaming experience through suffering. Now of course it’s been 42 years since the publication of the first Dungeons and Dragons ruleset, and we get to focus a little more on the story side of things (still enjoy the wargaming though!)

For my part, I knew that the party was sufficiently powerful that 90% of the things they’d encounter would be little more than annoyances, and as I’ve previously stated, I hate nuisance encounters. I suppose that I could have done what a lot of video games do and scaled up all the creatures, so that the river’s now patrolled by marauding red dragons, but I hate that: it completely destroys verisimilitude. I want the campaign world to maintain the illusion of an independently functioning world, not one that constantly adjusts itself to provide the characters more challenges. For as I’ve also mentioned before, I don’t mind when sometimes things are easy.

The final leg of the journey, through the Cinderlands, was one place where I could have legitimately thrown in some high-level encounters, seeing as how it’s described as an extremely dangerous area. The question then becomes: What do we gain by doing so? A band of giants might put up a decent fight, but won’t kill or seriously harm any of these characters, so there’s no lasting story effect. Preparing for and carrying out the fight would take a significant amount of time, something we’re already pressed for because we don’t meet that often to begin with. In exchange, we get the feeling that the Cinderlands are a dangerous place. An important thing to convey to the players, certainly, but maybe not worth the time sacrifice of a huge fight. In the end I decided to convey that feeling just by having the PCs see bad stuff in the distance. Maybe I was wrong, but I don’t mind saving the time several wilderness encounters would have taken, and now we get to the good stuff: fighting giants in Guiltspur!

Advertisements
Posted in GM Commentary
One comment on “Session Forty-Six: GM Commentary
  1. Morningstar says:

    I’m actually glad that you stuck to the story progressing instead of adding encounters to simply have encounters. Though a group of giants attacking us would have added a giant or two to our party (I may be playing a Transmuter, but she has access to a LOT of enchantment spells).

    This was a typical in between session for us, spent far too much time divvying up treasure and buying stuff, when we could have resolved that off-line by email. It’s like we can’t break away from old school role-playing mechanics even when we have access to radically different technologies, like email, shared drives, etc.

    Oh well, we made it to the net part of the adventure and we do find an unusual joy in bookkeeping, so we had fun anyway (and I guess that is the most important part).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

This website uses trademarks and/or copyrights owned by Paizo Inc., which are used under Paizo's Community Use Policy. We are expressly prohibited from charging you to use or access this content. This website is not published, endorsed, or specifically approved by Paizo Inc. For more information about Paizo's Community Use Policy, please visit paizo.com/communityuse. For more information about Paizo Inc. and Paizo products, please visit paizo.com.
%d bloggers like this: